Given how much electricity “AI” wastes uses. it’s in its own best interests to deny climate change. Or it would be, if there was such a thing as AI advanced enough to worry about self-preservation.

(Unnecessary explainer: Actually what this so-called AI would be doing would be standard speech-to-text and then using inferred rules based on statistics about what the next word would most likely be based on other recordings so that it could fill in the inaudible words. It’s a bit more advanced but same principle as Dragon Dictate, for those of us old enough to remember…

It has no idea what any of the words mean. It just “knows” which ones are likely to be the next ones in the phrase that it’s working on. “Unicorn” or “methane”, they’re both equally real to the software.)

The most likely reason is that otter.ai licence permits reuse and training on the inputs and news Ltd is worried about the exclusivity.

Probably they’ll relent when legals can guarantee it stays inside the barbed wire fence

‘Flood’ or ‘flush’?

I’m trying my best to flood AI’s source with anti-News Corp stuff.

…. or “Papa ‘doch”….

“BIG RUPERT IS WATCHING YOU!”